<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for anitations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lelangir.dasaku.net/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lelangir.dasaku.net</link>
	<description>(屮゜Д゜)屮</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:59:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Crusader, The Team Concept, and You are a Pirate by admin</title>
		<link>http://lelangir.dasaku.net/?p=1165&#038;cpage=1#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lelangir.dasaku.net/?p=1165#comment-928</guid>
		<description>it hasn&#039;t been published yet. Preemptive troll.

this isn&#039;t a conclusive post in itself, it just addresses what I found to be the salient points in Crusader&#039;s post...that is, if I could get past the extended metaphors. 

Put bluntly: Crusader&#039;s polemic made good points (they were mostly reiterations of things I&#039;ve previously said in different terms) in a way too long which was ironic (see last sentence of this post), and that saying I (or anyone really) hasnt had any &quot;achievements&quot; is just UGUU~

That last paragraph sounds pretty fukken trollish, but hey. No hard feelings...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it hasn&#8217;t been published yet. Preemptive troll.</p>
<p>this isn&#8217;t a conclusive post in itself, it just addresses what I found to be the salient points in Crusader&#8217;s post&#8230;that is, if I could get past the extended metaphors. </p>
<p>Put bluntly: Crusader&#8217;s polemic made good points (they were mostly reiterations of things I&#8217;ve previously said in different terms) in a way too long which was ironic (see last sentence of this post), and that saying I (or anyone really) hasnt had any &#8220;achievements&#8221; is just UGUU~</p>
<p>That last paragraph sounds pretty fukken trollish, but hey. No hard feelings&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Crusader, The Team Concept, and You are a Pirate by Nazarielle</title>
		<link>http://lelangir.dasaku.net/?p=1165&#038;cpage=1#comment-927</link>
		<dc:creator>Nazarielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lelangir.dasaku.net/?p=1165#comment-927</guid>
		<description>The article on THAT you&#039;re linking to doesn&#039;t exist. That or it&#039;s private :p

I&#039;m not sure what you&#039;re really getting at here though. Are you saying it&#039;s not worth the effort it takes to dredge up these behemoths of multi-author articles, because the effort doesn&#039;t show or isn&#039;t worth it? Or rather, is that what Crusader is saying and you&#039;re disagreeing?

I guess I should actually read through all that meta bullshit that omisyth started with his bringing up the blogosphere. Goddamnit this is going to take forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article on THAT you&#8217;re linking to doesn&#8217;t exist. That or it&#8217;s private :p</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what you&#8217;re really getting at here though. Are you saying it&#8217;s not worth the effort it takes to dredge up these behemoths of multi-author articles, because the effort doesn&#8217;t show or isn&#8217;t worth it? Or rather, is that what Crusader is saying and you&#8217;re disagreeing?</p>
<p>I guess I should actually read through all that meta bullshit that omisyth started with his bringing up the blogosphere. Goddamnit this is going to take forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on coburn, The Failure of Gar? by admin</title>
		<link>http://lelangir.dasaku.net/?p=1138&#038;cpage=1#comment-924</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lelangir.dasaku.net/?p=1138#comment-924</guid>
		<description>I was gonna mention &quot;dude from Berserk&quot; since bakaraptor always shows pictures of this insanely buff guy.

and how did I leave out everyone from DBZ??? For me, Vegeta is the EPITOME of GAR.

@ghost: I forgot, and thanks for reminding me, about the distinction between GAR and MANLY TEARS - if there really is a difference. We may think of GAR as a character trait, but MANLY TEARS as an event. 

Bucock really elicited a ton of MANY TEARS in the episode I won&#039;t spoil for innocent bystandards. I mean, &lt;em&gt;every&lt;/em&gt; character in LoGH produced MANLY TEARS at one point or another, and MANLY TEARS may not even be as related to GAR as we may think.

Though I&#039;d like to say that this 3 space graph is totalizing - are there any other aspects (axes) that are missing?

And, as for Bucock, he&#039;s not GAR when he&#039;s just an old man, but he becomes GAR later on, so when we situate characters on the graph I made, you really have to homogenize them disregard the temporality of the character.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was gonna mention &#8220;dude from Berserk&#8221; since bakaraptor always shows pictures of this insanely buff guy.</p>
<p>and how did I leave out everyone from DBZ??? For me, Vegeta is the EPITOME of GAR.</p>
<p>@ghost: I forgot, and thanks for reminding me, about the distinction between GAR and MANLY TEARS &#8211; if there really is a difference. We may think of GAR as a character trait, but MANLY TEARS as an event. </p>
<p>Bucock really elicited a ton of MANY TEARS in the episode I won&#8217;t spoil for innocent bystandards. I mean, <em>every</em> character in LoGH produced MANLY TEARS at one point or another, and MANLY TEARS may not even be as related to GAR as we may think.</p>
<p>Though I&#8217;d like to say that this 3 space graph is totalizing &#8211; are there any other aspects (axes) that are missing?</p>
<p>And, as for Bucock, he&#8217;s not GAR when he&#8217;s just an old man, but he becomes GAR later on, so when we situate characters on the graph I made, you really have to homogenize them disregard the temporality of the character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on coburn, The Failure of Gar? by bateszi</title>
		<link>http://lelangir.dasaku.net/?p=1138&#038;cpage=1#comment-923</link>
		<dc:creator>bateszi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lelangir.dasaku.net/?p=1138#comment-923</guid>
		<description>Guts from Berserk actually won the Saigar competition back when it first ran. So, I have to say, if anyone wants to try and understand &#039;gar&#039;, or at least, what the word means to the majority of people, you should probably be looking at him first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guts from Berserk actually won the Saigar competition back when it first ran. So, I have to say, if anyone wants to try and understand &#8216;gar&#8217;, or at least, what the word means to the majority of people, you should probably be looking at him first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on coburn, The Failure of Gar? by ghostlightning</title>
		<link>http://lelangir.dasaku.net/?p=1138&#038;cpage=1#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>ghostlightning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lelangir.dasaku.net/?p=1138#comment-922</guid>
		<description>Admiral Bucock, HE IS GAR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Admiral Bucock, HE IS GAR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on zeroblade, On the Merits of Anime Blogging by omo</title>
		<link>http://lelangir.dasaku.net/?p=1084&#038;cpage=1#comment-921</link>
		<dc:creator>omo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 04:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lelangir.dasaku.net/?p=1084#comment-921</guid>
		<description>Owen is right--you want 3 prongs on your pitchfork. Makes a better devil&#039;s advocate that way.

And to an extent most of us exhibit all three aspects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Owen is right&#8211;you want 3 prongs on your pitchfork. Makes a better devil&#8217;s advocate that way.</p>
<p>And to an extent most of us exhibit all three aspects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on zeroblade, On the Merits of Anime Blogging by ghostlightning</title>
		<link>http://lelangir.dasaku.net/?p=1084&#038;cpage=1#comment-920</link>
		<dc:creator>ghostlightning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lelangir.dasaku.net/?p=1084#comment-920</guid>
		<description>Ooh, I like the categorization. Prongs on the same trident, or otherwise.

As long as we use these categories to describe but never to limit, I&#039;m all for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh, I like the categorization. Prongs on the same trident, or otherwise.</p>
<p>As long as we use these categories to describe but never to limit, I&#8217;m all for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on about by Preemptive ABA 2009 Nominations &#171; notdotq</title>
		<link>http://lelangir.dasaku.net/?page_id=421&#038;cpage=1#comment-918</link>
		<dc:creator>Preemptive ABA 2009 Nominations &#171; notdotq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lelangir.dasaku.net/?page_id=421#comment-918</guid>
		<description>[...] Most Thought-Provoking For little old me, thought-provoking in the &#8217;sphere has come to mean &#8220;RyanA, ghostlightning, Cuchlann, and lelangir debating something on a grossly meta level, replete with literary references and the names of psychologists.&#8221; That gives me over nine thousand directions to go in for listing blogs, as we&#8217;ve got RyanA&#8217;s one blog, Cuchlann&#8217;s two, ghostlightning&#8217;s three four, and&#8230; well, I can&#8217;t even begin counting all the blogs lelangir posts at. Ten, I think. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Most Thought-Provoking For little old me, thought-provoking in the &#8217;sphere has come to mean &#8220;RyanA, ghostlightning, Cuchlann, and lelangir debating something on a grossly meta level, replete with literary references and the names of psychologists.&#8221; That gives me over nine thousand directions to go in for listing blogs, as we&#8217;ve got RyanA&#8217;s one blog, Cuchlann&#8217;s two, ghostlightning&#8217;s three four, and&#8230; well, I can&#8217;t even begin counting all the blogs lelangir posts at. Ten, I think. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on zeroblade, On the Merits of Anime Blogging by lolikitsune</title>
		<link>http://lelangir.dasaku.net/?p=1084&#038;cpage=1#comment-917</link>
		<dc:creator>lolikitsune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lelangir.dasaku.net/?p=1084#comment-917</guid>
		<description>And sometimes, a blogger grabs the haft of the trident rather than the prongs. A good thing too, or else we&#039;d all have bleeding hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And sometimes, a blogger grabs the haft of the trident rather than the prongs. A good thing too, or else we&#8217;d all have bleeding hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Statistics &amp; User-Feedback 12/08/08-01/06/09 [comments open] by Nazarielle</title>
		<link>http://lelangir.dasaku.net/?p=1085&#038;cpage=1#comment-916</link>
		<dc:creator>Nazarielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lelangir.dasaku.net/?p=1085#comment-916</guid>
		<description>1. Do you use a feed reader such as Google Reader, and if so, do you read anitations’ content in said reader?
&lt;strong&gt;I use a feed reader, but I read the contents of most blogs in Firefox, rather than the reader.&lt;/strong&gt;

2. In a given day’s new posted content, how many posts do you read?
&lt;strong&gt;Depends on how bored I am. I can read anywhere from 5 to 20, if I get on a roll.&lt;/strong&gt;

3. In a given post, how many embedded links do you click?
&lt;strong&gt;If it&#039;s something directly relating to the post, I&#039;ll read as many as there are. Which can be really dangerous, as I can get caught in a never ending recursive chain, trying to read one article, then reading another before finishing the first, then being forwarded to another, etc&lt;/strong&gt;

4. And, if so, do you then proceed to read the post that was linked?
&lt;strong&gt;Well, to add to what I said above, too many links to other topics can be a bit daunting. That&#039;s sorta why I like anitations, usually the most important part is quoted and discussed. So I guess yes and no, depending on the situation.&lt;/strong&gt;

5. Have you read the page “anitating strategies”?
&lt;strong&gt;Nope&lt;/strong&gt;

6. If so, have you found it insightful?
&lt;strong&gt;n/a&lt;/strong&gt;

7. On a scale of 1-10, 10 being the best, rate the quality of posts categorized as notes at anitations.
&lt;strong&gt;9.5&lt;/strong&gt;

8. On a scale of 1-10, 10 being the best, rate the quality of posts categorized as collected at anitations.
&lt;strong&gt;9.5&lt;/strong&gt;

9. On a scale of 1-10, 10 being the best, rate the quality of posts categorized as anthologies at anitations.
&lt;strong&gt;10&lt;/strong&gt;

10. On a scale of 1-10, 10 being the best, rate the quality of posts categorized as summaries at anitations.
&lt;strong&gt;10&lt;/strong&gt;

11. On a scale of 1-10, 10 being the best, rate the quality of anitations’ navigation (categories, widgets)
&lt;strong&gt;7&lt;/strong&gt;

12. Yes or no: would you like to see a more diverse selection of anitated bloggers?
&lt;strong&gt;Yes. While there&#039;s a huge list already, it never hurts to add more to the pile in this case.&lt;/strong&gt;

13. Yes or no: is anitations too trollish?
&lt;strong&gt;Only sometimes. But I find trolling amusing personally, so I don&#039;t mind it anyway&lt;/strong&gt;

14. Please give anitations your general opinion.
&lt;strong&gt;It&#039;s like a mini-feed reader that gathers together posts on similar topics. I really do find it helpful to see similar and conflicting opinions all in one place. That said, concerning a lot of the stuff discussed here, I feel a bit out of my league. I guess I&#039;m just not quite as invested in blogging as some others. To me, it&#039;s just a hobby, a place to write down my thoughts, however shallow they may be.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Do you use a feed reader such as Google Reader, and if so, do you read anitations’ content in said reader?<br />
<strong>I use a feed reader, but I read the contents of most blogs in Firefox, rather than the reader.</strong></p>
<p>2. In a given day’s new posted content, how many posts do you read?<br />
<strong>Depends on how bored I am. I can read anywhere from 5 to 20, if I get on a roll.</strong></p>
<p>3. In a given post, how many embedded links do you click?<br />
<strong>If it&#8217;s something directly relating to the post, I&#8217;ll read as many as there are. Which can be really dangerous, as I can get caught in a never ending recursive chain, trying to read one article, then reading another before finishing the first, then being forwarded to another, etc</strong></p>
<p>4. And, if so, do you then proceed to read the post that was linked?<br />
<strong>Well, to add to what I said above, too many links to other topics can be a bit daunting. That&#8217;s sorta why I like anitations, usually the most important part is quoted and discussed. So I guess yes and no, depending on the situation.</strong></p>
<p>5. Have you read the page “anitating strategies”?<br />
<strong>Nope</strong></p>
<p>6. If so, have you found it insightful?<br />
<strong>n/a</strong></p>
<p>7. On a scale of 1-10, 10 being the best, rate the quality of posts categorized as notes at anitations.<br />
<strong>9.5</strong></p>
<p>8. On a scale of 1-10, 10 being the best, rate the quality of posts categorized as collected at anitations.<br />
<strong>9.5</strong></p>
<p>9. On a scale of 1-10, 10 being the best, rate the quality of posts categorized as anthologies at anitations.<br />
<strong>10</strong></p>
<p>10. On a scale of 1-10, 10 being the best, rate the quality of posts categorized as summaries at anitations.<br />
<strong>10</strong></p>
<p>11. On a scale of 1-10, 10 being the best, rate the quality of anitations’ navigation (categories, widgets)<br />
<strong>7</strong></p>
<p>12. Yes or no: would you like to see a more diverse selection of anitated bloggers?<br />
<strong>Yes. While there&#8217;s a huge list already, it never hurts to add more to the pile in this case.</strong></p>
<p>13. Yes or no: is anitations too trollish?<br />
<strong>Only sometimes. But I find trolling amusing personally, so I don&#8217;t mind it anyway</strong></p>
<p>14. Please give anitations your general opinion.<br />
<strong>It&#8217;s like a mini-feed reader that gathers together posts on similar topics. I really do find it helpful to see similar and conflicting opinions all in one place. That said, concerning a lot of the stuff discussed here, I feel a bit out of my league. I guess I&#8217;m just not quite as invested in blogging as some others. To me, it&#8217;s just a hobby, a place to write down my thoughts, however shallow they may be.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
